Peer Review Policy

1. Introduction

The Journal for Social Science Studies (JSSS) is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic rigor and scholarly integrity in its publishing process. We employ a robust peer-review system to ensure the quality, originality, and significance of published research. This policy outlines the principles and procedures that guide our peer-review process.

2. Review Process:

• Double-Blind Review: JSSS utilizes a double-blind review process where neither the reviewers nor the authors are aware of each other's identities. This helps to eliminate potential bias and ensures fair and objective evaluations.
• Reviewer Selection: Reviewers are carefully chosen based on their expertise in the relevant field and their familiarity with the journal's aims and scope. We strive to achieve diversity in reviewer selection with respect to research areas, institutions, and geographical locations.
• Number of Reviews: Each manuscript undergoes review by at least two expert reviewers. In some cases, the editorial team may request additional reviews for complex or controversial topics.
• Review Format: Reviewers are provided with a standardized review form that addresses key aspects of the manuscript, including:
  • Originality and significance of the research.
  • Theoretical grounding and methodological soundness.
  • Data analysis and interpretation.
  • Clarity and organization of the writing.
  • Overall contribution to the field of social sciences.
• Review Timeline: Reviewers are expected to submit their reports within a specified timeframe. The editorial team will work with reviewers to address any delays or unforeseen circumstances.
• Author Response: Authors are given the opportunity to respond to reviewer comments and revise their manuscripts based on feedback. The revised manuscript is then re-evaluated by the editor and reviewers to determine the final decision.

3. Ethical Considerations:

• Confidentiality: All manuscripts and reviewer reports are treated with utmost confidentiality. Reviewers are expected to refrain from sharing any information about the submitted work with anyone outside the review process.
• Conflict of Interest: Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as personal or professional relationships with the authors or their institutions. The editor will make a decision on whether to proceed with the review based on the nature of the conflict.
• Objectivity and Respect: Reviewers are expected to provide constructive and objective feedback while maintaining a respectful and professional tone. Personal attacks or discriminatory language are strictly prohibited.

4. Appeals Process:

Authors who are dissatisfied with the decision on their manuscript have the right to appeal. The appeals process is outlined in the JSSS author guidelines and involves submitting a formal request to the Editor-in-Chief.

5. Continuous Improvement:

JSSS actively seeks feedback from authors, reviewers, and the wider academic community on its peer-review process. We are committed to continuous improvement and will regularly review and update our policy to ensure its effectiveness and adherence to best practices.